Sexual Function, Mental Well-being and Quality of Life among Kurdish Circumcised Women in Iran

Farzaneh DANESHKHAH ¹, *Hamid ALLAHVERDIPOUR ^{1, 2}, Leila JAHANGIRI ¹, Tatiana ANDREEVA ³

1. of Health Education & Promotion, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
   2. Clinical Psychiatry Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
      3. School of Public Health, National University of Kyiv-Mohyla Academy, Kiev, Ukraine

Abstract

Background: Female genital mutilation is an intentional inhumane procedure that threatens girls and women’s health. It is especially widespread in developing countries due to cultural, traditional and religious preferences. The aim of the current study was to investigate how circumcision affects women’s sexual function.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted in the urban and rural area of Piranshahr County, Iran, in 2015 among convenience samples of 200 women, 15-49 yr old, who were applying to health care centers for receiving rou-tine health care services. Data collection was conducted with the use of a self-administered written questionnaire to assess female sexual function, mental well-being, and quality of life.

Results: Significant differences were found between circumcised and non-circumcised women in total score of female sexual function index (FSFI) in domains of desire, arousal, vaginal moisture, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain [(P<0.001), MD(95%CI)=5.64(3.64 to 7.64)] and based on Hotelling’s T-square, significant differences were found in dimensions of quality of life and FSFI.

Conclusion: The revealed sexual dysfunction among mutilated women gives ground to require that public health sys-tems take actions aimed at implementing special sexual education program to improve sexual functions of mutilated women and changing beliefs and social norms in the community level.

Keywords: Female circumcision, Circumcision, Sexual function, Women’s health

Introduction

Many girls born in countries of Africa and Middle East undergo inhuman procedure known as Fe-male Genital Mutilation/Cutting (FGM/C). “FGM/C refers to all the procedures that inten-tionally alter female genitalia including their partial or total removal for non-medical purposes” (1).

About 100–140 million girls and women have undergone FGM and are suffering FGM conse-quences globally. FGM currently occurs in 28 African countries affecting 67.7 million girls and women who are currently 15–49 yr old and more than three million girls have been estimated to be

at risk for FGM annually (1, 2). In addition to African countries, this phenomenon is seen in the East Asian countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, and India as well as in the Middle East and among migrants from these areas to Europe, the USA, Australia and other countries where mi-grants carry along their own traditions (3-6). The described practices need to be terminated based on principles stated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights article five saying that “no one shall be subjected to torture or cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment” (7).

History and the rationale why FGM is practiced in certain nations, religions, and cultures are not sufficiently understood except for the fact that female genital mutilation was known since an-cient Egypt (8). Current observations show that FGM is common in some Islamic countries (9). The prerequisites for female genital mutilation are related to a mix of cultural, customary, tradi-tional, religious and social factors within families and communities, perceived as ancestral socio-cultural roots (1). The rationale for performing FGM/C includes preservation of ethnic and gen-der identity, maintenance of ‘cleanliness’ and as-surance of women’s virginity, along with the con-trol of women’s sexuality. FGM/C is also consid-ered as a rite of passage from childhood to adult-hood (3, 10, 11).

FGM harms girls and women in many ways (1, 10, 12). In others words, FGM is a risk factor for several adverse health conditions among women, and all types of FGM procedures have immediate and long-term health consequences (13). Imme-diate complication of FGM includes severe pain, shock, hemorrhage, and infection that can lead to septicemia and acute urine retention, psychologi-cal consequences, as well as open sores in the genital region (3, 9, 11). In a long run, a range of traumatic consequences can arise including geni-tal ulcers, keloid scars, fibrosis, and chronic vul-var pain; inflammatory consequences include re-current bladder infections; menstrual difficulties which might manifest as painful and prolonged periods; and psychosexual consequences includ-ing dyspareunia and sexual dysfunction (3, 14). With three types of FGM being distinguished (1), most severe complications arise with types II and

• procedures and especially type III that include repeated urinary tract and pelvic infections, urethra damage, infertility, an increased risk of childbirth complications, and natal deaths (15, 16). Additionally, various sexual dysfunctions as a component of FGM consequences affect wom-en’s emotional and sexual well-being (16-19).

The above-mentioned evidence of FGM devas-tating impact became the ground for the UN dec-laration on the elimination of FGM and the

WHO commitment to provide a “Global strategy to stop health care providers from performing female genital mutilation” (1), which calls all health professionals to act to prevent this harm-ful and violent practice which is inhuman and threatening to women’s human rights.

FGM is known as a traumatic procedure that can demolish and impair sexual functions of mutilat-ed women including altered desire/libido, pain/discomfort, and diminished arousal result-ing in inhibited orgasm(3, 14) while the British Medical Association concluded that little is doc-umented with regard to the psychosexual and psychological consequences of FGM (20). Addi-tionally, not much has yet been documented with regard to psychosexual outcomes of FGM specif-ic for different nations and regions. In Iran, with a great variety of national, racial, and religious groups, FGM predominantly occurs in the west and south of Iran where most of the people are Sunni (the largest branch of Islam) or belong to Kurdish nation.

Based on the above mentioned background, the aims of the current study were to obtain infor-mation about the consequences of female cir-cumcision on sexual function of circumcised women. We also aimed to acquire explorative information regarding the status of FGM, its prevalence, predominant method/type of female circumcision, and attitude to this practice among the Kurdish women in Iran.

Materials and Methods

Participants and Procedures

This cross-sectional study was performed in Pi-ranshahr County, Iran, near the border of Iraq where a part of Kurdish people is living there. Participants (n=200) were sexually active married women of child-bearing age 15-49. Convenience sampling was conducted through two urban and five rural health centers; all the women who ap-plied to health care centers for routine health care services during the data collection period and agreed to participate were recruited. Data were collected during Feb and Mar 2015 by means of in-person home-based interviews guided with a structured written questionnaire and clinical examination by a midwife. In case of needing to clinical examination, participants were examined by a midwife in the clinic. All participants were covered with governmental health care services. The age of women ranged between 15 and 49 yr; 9.5% of women were younger than 20 yr, 42% were 21-30 yr old, 37% were 31-40 yr old, and 11.5% were older than 41 yr.

Tabriz University of Medical Sciences’ Ethics Committee approved the study, and informed consent was obtained from all study participants before the interview and clinical examination.

Measures

Socio-demographic variables

Socio-demographic variables included age, dura-tion of marriage, employment status (employed, housewife), education (illiterate, primary, second-ary education, high school and higher), number of deliveries, place of living (rural or urban area) and parents’ education level.

History of FGM

This was defined as any partial or total removal of the external female genitalia during the child-hood age. In addition, for determining the type of FGM, participating women were asked about which parts of their genital organs were removed, cutting tool, circumcised, and age they have un-dergone FGM. In case of needing to diagnose the type of FGM, participants were under examina-tion by a midwife. Additionally, viewpoints of circumcised women about why they had been under FGM were obtained by a brief semi-structured interview.

Female sexual function index (FSFI)

The FSFI is a brief, multidimensional, validated tool for assessment of sexual function and con-sists of nineteen items for six domains of libido, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain (e.g. ‘‘Over the past 4 wk, how often did you feel sexual desire or interest? Almost always or al-ways; Most of the time (more than half of the time); Sometimes (about half the time); On a few occasions (less than half of the time); Almost never or never”). Each item has six possible answers that describe the status of sexual function during the last four weeks (14, 21). Responses to each question related to the previous month were recorded and scored either from 0 (no sexual ac-tivity) or 1 (suggestive of dysfunction) to 5 (sug-gestive of normal sexual activity). The reliability coefficient for the scale was 0.95. Higher scores on the scale indicated normal sexual activity.

Quality of Life (QoL)

• 26-item rating scale was used to gauge wom-en’s perception of their quality of life (QoL) in four domains of Physical health, Psychological,

Social relationship, and Environment (e.g. ‘‘How would you rate your quality of life? Very poor; Poor; Neither poor nor good; Good; Very Good’’). A 5-point Likert-type scaling (1=strongly disagree, 5=strongly agree and 1=never, 5=completely) was used (22). The relia-bility coefficient for the scale was 0.94. Higher scores on the scale indicated better QoL.

Mental wellbeing

The validated 28-item Farsi version of the Gen-eral Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28)(23)was used to measure the wellbeing of women. The GHQ refers to subjective symptoms of psycho-logical distress, somatic manifestations often as-sociated with anxiety and depression, relationship difficulties, and perception of social, family, and professional roles (24). The GHQ-28 is com-posed of four subscales used to measure somati-zation, anxiety, social dysfunction, and depres-sion. Both subscales and summated total scores were used (24, 25). All items had ordinal four-point Likert-type scales (0-1-2-3). A higher score on the GHQ-28 represents poorer mental health status. The reliability of coefficients of reliability of the subscales varies around 0.87 and the inter-nal consistency of the total scale is 0.90.

Statistical analysis

Information obtained from the two groups was analyzed using SPSS version 16 for Microsoft Windows (Chicago, IL, USA). The statistics used to describe the groups included mean, standard deviation, frequencies (number of cases) and percentages where appropriate. Comparison of quantitative variables between circumcised and non-circumcised women was conducted using Student’s t-test for independent samples. To compare categorical data, Chi-square test of in-dependence was performed. Exact Fisher’s test was used instead when the expected frequencies in some subgroups were less than 5. The Ho-telling’s T-square method was applied for simul-taneous comparisons of dimensions between FGM and non-FGM women and finally, bivariate analysis was performed to ascertain the associa-tion between the quality of life and general health with sexual function trait. The correlations be-tween low quality of life as well as low level of general health and low sexual function trait were assessed using Pearson correlation. In all anal-yses, P<0.05 was considered statistically signifi-cant.

Results

In our sample, the total rate of FGM was 70% (n=140). With 53.6% (n=75) among women of older than 31 yr age and 8.6% (n=12) in the less than 20 yr old group. Among the rural women, 93 (66.4%) were circumcised versus 13 (22.7%) among the women in the urban area. Among the uncircumcised women, 17 (28.5%) were em-ployed while it was true about 19 (13.3%) of cir-cumcised women (Table 1).

Table 1: Demographic characteristics of noncircumcised and circumcised women

	Variables		Non FGM (n=60)	FGM (N=140)	P-Value
			n(%)	n(%)
	Age (yr)	Less than 20	7(11.7)	12(8.6)	0.048
		20-30	31(51.7)	53(37.9)
		31-49	22(36.7)	75(53.6)
	Occupation	Housewife	43 (71.7)	121(86.4)	0.013
		Employed	(28.3)17	19(13.6)
	Education	Illiterate	1(1.7)	34(24.3)	<0.000
		Primary	7(11.7)	48(34.3)
		secondary	13(21.6)	23(16.4)
		high school	21(35.0)	21(15.0)
		More	18(30.0)	14(10.0)
	Mother’s education	illiterate	37(61.7)	125(89.3)	<0.001
		primary	6(10.0)	10(7.1)
		secondary	4(6.7)	5(3.6)
		high school	9(15.0)	0(0.0)
		more	4(6.7)	0(0.0)
	Father’s education	illiterate	45.0(27)	100(71.5)	<0.000
		primary	8(13.3)	29(20.7)
		secondary	5(8.4)	2(1.4)
		high school	12(20.0)	8(5.7)
		more	8(13.3)	1(0.7)
	Housing	Owned	45(75.0)	123(87.9)	0.023
		Rented	15(25.0)	17(12.1)
	Residence	Urban	47(78.3)	47(33.6)	<0.000
		Rural	13(21.7)	93(66.4)
	Income	Low	19(31.7)	28(20.0)	0.115
		Middle	39(65.0)	100(71.4)
		High	2(3.3)	12(8.6)
			Mean)SD)	Mean)SD)
	Duration of marriage		6.66(0.85)	10.52(0.62(
	Number of children		1.18(0.14)	1.88 (0.09)

In addition, 125 (89.3%) of participants with history of FGM reported that their mothers were illiterate versus 37 (61.7%) among uncircumcised women and participants who had literate mother were not circumcised. Table 2 shows the average scores for the participating women’s sexual func-tion: a significant difference was found (P<0.001) between circumcised (mean=18.25, SD=6.32) and non-circumcised (mean=23.90, SD=7.12) women. Additionally, significant differences were found between two groups in all the domains of sexual function scale including desire, arousal, vaginal moisture, orgasm, satisfaction and pain with circumcised women having lower sexual function scores. However, no significant differ-ences between the two groups were found in the quality of life score: (mean=52.73, SD=12.59) among circumcised women and (mean=53.39, SD=12.13) among those non-circumcised. Addi-tionally, average scores for all the domains of quality of life are brought in Table 2. The calculated scores for general health status did not re-veal significant differences between the two groups of participants (P-value: 0.935).

Table 2: Comparison of female sexual function index, quality of life, and mental wellbeing between two groups of circumcised and non-circumcised women

Variable		Mean (SD)		MD** (95%CI)	P-Value
		FGM*	Non FGM
		(n=140)	(n=60)
FSFI	Desire	2.67(1.07)	3.67(1.43)	0.99(0.63 to 1.35)	<0.001
	Arousal	2.85(1.30)	3.95(1.46)	1.09(0.67 to 1.50)	<0.001
	Vaginal moisture	3.02(1.18)	4.01(1.37)	0.98(0.61 to 1.36)	<0.001
	Orgasm	2.32(1.19)	3.64(1.32)	1.32(0.94 to 1.69)	<0.001
	Satisfaction	3.60(1.54)	4.34(1.45)	0.74(0.28 to 1.20)	0.002
	Pain	3.78(1.56)	4.28(1.14)	0.50(0.06 to 0.94)	0.025
	Total	18.25(6.32)	23.90(7.12)	5.64(3.64 to 7.64)	<0.001
WHOQOL-BREF	General Health	63.12(20.57)	64.16(17.14)	1.04(-4.92 to 7.01)	0.731
	Physical Health	62.88(15.96)	61.48(15.22)	-1.39(-6.18 to 3.39)	0.567
	Psychological	56.96(16.52)	59.86(14.39)	2.89(-1.94 to 7.74)	0.240
	Social Relationship	21.45(5.65)	22.60(6.44)	1.15(-0.64 to 2.94)	0.207
	Environment	59.24(14.50)	58.85(15.06)	-0.38(-4.85 to 4.07)	0.864
	Total	52.73(12.59)	53.39(12.13)	0.66(-3.12 to 4.45)	0.731
GHQ-28	Somatic symptoms	5.99(3.71)	6.58(3.78)	0.59(-0.54 to 1.72)	0.307
	Anxiety and insom-	5.98(4.17)	6.20(4.29)	0.21(-1.06 to 1.49)	0.742
	nia
	Social dysfunction	7.30(1.62)	7.21(1.15)	-0.09(-0.54 to 0.36)	0.696
	Severe depression	4.87(4.70)	4.30(4.27)	-0.57(-1.97 to 0.81)	0.414
	Total	24.16(10.90)	24.30(10.43)	0.13(-3.14 to3.41)	0.935

• FGM – Female Genital Mutilation
• MD – mean difference

CI : Confidence interval

P-Value based on independent samples t-test Assessment of sexual behavior in two groups (Table 3) showed that 68 (48.8%) of circumcised women had low desire for having a sexual rela-tionship while only 16 (26.7%) were similarly characterized among the non-circumcised. Re-garding women’s demand or offer for sexual contact, 15 (25%) of non-circumcised had history of offering sexual contact vs. four (2.9%) among circumcised women which constitute a statistical-ly significant difference. Additionally, 14 (10%) of circumcised women reported history of violence against them by their husband while only 2 (3.3%) reported so among the non-circumcised.

Table 3: Comparison of sexual function between two groups of circumcised and non-circumcised women

Variables		Non FGM (n=60)	FGM (n=140)	P-Value
		n (%)	n (%)
Sexual status	Low desire	16(26.7)	68(48.6)	<0.001
	High desire	23(38.3)	12(8.6)
	Normal	21(35.0)	60(42.8)
Demand for sexual contact by	Men	44(73.3)	130(92.9)	<0.001
	Woman	15(25.0)	4(2.9)
	Both	1(1.7)	6(4.3)
Frequency of intercourse per month	4 ≤	17(28.3)	20(14.3)	0.051
	4-20	40(66.7)	117(83.6)
	20 ≥	3(5.0)	3(2.1)
History of Sexual violence by husband	No	58(96.7)	126(90.0)	0.111
	Yes	2(3.3)	14(10.0)

* FGM – Female Genital Mutilation

P-Value based on Chi-square/Fisher’s exact test

There were significant correlation between low quality of life (r=0.42, P-value<0.000) and low level of general health(r= -0.65, P-value<0.000) with low sexual function trait.

The common type of mutilation in Iran was type I or clitoridectomy and all the FGM participants were circumcised by removing a part or the whole of clitoris. Regarding viewpoints of cir-cumcised women about why they had been under FGM, 64 (45.7%) reported that religious beliefs, traditional rituals, and customs were the main factors of FGM while 58 (41.4%) of participants did not share any understanding of why they have been circumcised. Additionally, 80 (57.1%) of circumcised women reported that religious beliefs and traditional rituals were the main rea-son for their families and mothers to opt for the FGM procedure for their daughters while 45 (32.9%) reported that cultural beliefs about controlling sexual desire among women were main reasons for mothers to select FGM. Ac-cording to the women participating in the study, men including fathers had no role on FGM in the studied area. All women were circumcised with a razor; 118 (84.3%) of participants responded that gypsy women were responsible for cutting the girls’ genital organs; 15 (10.7%) responded that relatives did so, and 7 (5%) said that this was done by local women. As regards the age when study participants had been circumcised, 72 (51.4%) of women reported that they were circumcised before age 3 and did not remember this, 65 (46.5%) had been 4-12 yr old, and 3 (2.1%) were older than 12 yr and they could recall this unpleasant event. Additionally, partici-pants reported that they had been subjected to FGM based on their mothers and grandmothers’ request. As for the next generation (the daughters of study participants), none of the respondents reported having subjected their daughters to FGM.

Table 4: Simultaneous comparison of dimensions of FSFI,WHOQOL-BREF and GHQ-28 between FGM and non-GGM women

	Wilks’ Lambda Value	F	df1	df2	P-Value
GHQ-28	0.980	0.983b	4.000	195.000	0.418
WHOQOL-BREF	0.934	2.720b	5.000	194.000	0.021
FSFI	0.732	11.795b	6.000	193.000	<.001

Results based on Multivariate Tests of Hotelling’s T-square

The results of Hotelling’s T-square use for simul-taneous comparisons of dimensions between FGM and non-FGM women showed that there were significant differences in QoL and FSFI scores while there was no significant difference in mental well-being score between the two groups (Table 4).

Discussion

The findings of the current study show that women with the history of genital mutilation happen in some parts of Iran similarly to other countries in the Middle East. In particular, it had been common previously between the Arab and Kurds because of cultural and religious beliefs of Sunni Muslims living in the west and south of Iran. However, these practices have dramatically decreased within recent years.

In this study, the proportion of women with FGM was as high as 70% among studied partici-pants in the previous years but it has seen a de-creasing trend of FGM among young women in compare of old women and none of the study participants reported FGM on their daughters. Although our study was not conducted on a community level, our findings are comparable with the results of the studies conducted in high prevalence communities such as 27 African coun-tries, Yemen and Iraqi Kurdistan (26-28). The prevalence that we estimated is in line with stud-ies from some ethnic and religious groups located in the west and south of Iran, where most people are Sunni (29).

One of the prominent facets and facts about cir-cumcising of young girls is the exclusive role of women and mothers in conducting circumcision of girls. In other words, men have no determin-ing role with regard to this practice. Similarly, to other nations and countries (3, 5), findings of the current study indicate that women are responsi-ble for FGM in the west of Iran. Fortunately, in the recent years, mothers in Iran are not request-ing that their daughters be subjected to circumci-sion. The rate of FGM is reduced considerably because when it was asked all participants, none of them reported history of circumcision on their daughters but it is needed to systematic research to measure the current rate of FGM among young girls.

Besides ethnic and religious factors, the likeli-hood of women undergoing FGM might be re-lated to low literacy level among the rural popula-tion. In this study, FGM was significantly associ-ated with some variables, including unemploy-ment and lower literacy of parents. Therefore, the practice of FGM is pertinent to certain social and ethnic groups, which is in line with findings in Ethiopia (30) and Egypt. More than 80% of the circumcised women were illiterate and unem-ployed and that the probability of FGM declined with educational level while being higher among women in lower social strata (31). Low education level and consequent lower level of health knowledge, unemployment and its related pov-erty in line with living in the deprived rural area might have posed these women at risk of becom-ing victims of FGM in the studied sample of Kurdish population in Iran.

Clitoris, which is a sexually sensitive tissue, is re-moved partially or totally in any type of FGM. There is increasing evidence that FGM damages sexual function (3, 14), and findings of the cur-rent study demonstrate that FGM was signifi-cantly associated with diminished female sexual function. In addition, all domains of female sexu-al function namely desire, arousal, lubrication, orgasm, satisfaction, and pain could be affected because of FGM; this is consistent with findings of a recent case-control study in Egypt (32). In contrast, in Saudi Arabia was reported no differ-ence in mean desire score or pain score between FGM and non-mutilated females; however, statis-tically significant differences were reported be-tween the two groups in arousal, lubrication, or-gasm, and satisfaction, as well as the overall sexu-al function score(14). Additionally, as a systemat-ic review and a meta-analysis have concluded, women subjected to FGM significantly more like-ly reported dyspareunia, the absence of sexual desire, and reduced sexual satisfaction (33).

Additionally, numerous studies have identified depression, anxiety and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) as potential consequences of FGM (34-36). FGM has psychological and mental ef-fects, our study did not reveal discrepancies in mental wellbeing between circumcised and non-circumcised women, and thus, this hypothesis can be further tested in larger scale studies paying more attention to mental health of these women. Despite progressive improvement about health indices and quality of health care services, human society is facing phenomenon of female circum-cision, which threatens the health of girls where they become victims of inhumane practices based on certain cultural beliefs. Nowadays, two types of health promotive approaches are needed to overcome FGM phenomenon. First, preventing female circumcision among child girls and sec-ondly, supporting circumcised girls and women who are suffering consequences of FGM.

This study had a number of limitations. First, the cross-sectional study was conducted on a con-venience sample of women in Piranshahr County; as a result, our findings cannot be generalized to all Sunni and Kurdish women and other popula-tions of Iran. In addition, the study used self-reported measures that could lead to inaccurate recall and/or reporting. Furthermore, some measurements were conducted with the use of a researcher-designed questionnaire for collecting socio-demographic and health data, rather than using previously standardized instruments, which may have resulted in lack of comparability with other studies, inaccuracies, and misclassification. Nevertheless, this was the first study of this kind among the under-studied population of Kurdish women.

Conclusion

Many of the Kurdish girls in the county of Pi-ranshahr were circumcised in the past decades, and clitoridectomy was the most common type of mutilation impairing sexual function of muti-lated women. Nevertheless, no differences were found between circumcised and non-circumcised women in quality of life and mental wellbeing, which probably confirms that clitoridectomy, is a less harmful procedure in comparison to other types of FGM. Additionally, none of the mutilat-ed women allowed that their daughters be sub-jected to FGM which indicate a progressive re-duction in the rate of female genital mutilation in recent years.

Ethical considerations

Ethical issues (Including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or fal-sification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc.) have been completely observed by the authors.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Tabriz Universi-ty of Medical Sciences for financial support. The authors would like to acknowledge all partici-pants of the study.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

References

4. World Health Organization (2017). fact sheet on female genital mutilation. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets /fs241/en/
5. Mulongo P,  McAndrew  S,  Hollins  Martin  C (2014).  Crossing  borders:  Discussing  the evidence relating to the mental health needs of   women   exposed   to   female   genital mutilation. Int J Ment Health Nurs, 23:296-305.
6. Kaplan A, Forbes M, Bonhoure I, et al (2013). Female genital mutilation/cutting in The Gambia: long-term health consequences and complications during delivery and for the newborn. Int J Womens Health, 5:323-31.
7. Bjälkander O, Bangura L, Leigh B, et al (2012). Health complications of female genital mutilation in Sierra Leone. Int J Womens Health, 4:321-331.
8. Kaplan A, Hechavarría S, Martín M, Bonhoure I (2011). Health consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting in the Gambia, evidence into action. Reprod Health, 8:26.
9. Reisel D, Creighton SM (2015). Long-term health consequences of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM). Maturitas, 80:48-51.
10. United Nations (1948). Universal declaration of human rights. http://www.un.org/en/events/humanrights day/2007/hrphotos/declaration%20_eng.pdf
11. Barstow DG (1999). Female genital mutilation: the penultimate gender abuse. Child Abuse Negl, 23:501-510.
12. Bogale D, Markos D, Kaso M (2014). Prevalence of female genital mutilation and its effect on women’s health in Bale zone, Ethiopia: a cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 14:1076.
13. Ouldzeidoune N, Keating J, Bertrand J, Rice J (2013). A description of female genital mutilation and force-feeding practices in Mauritania: implications for the protection of child rights and health. PloS One, 8:e60594.
14. Berg RC, Denison EM-L, Fretheim A (2010). Psychological, social and sexual consequences of female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C): a systematic review of quantitative studies. http://www.kunnskapssenteret.no/en/public ations/psychological-social-and-sexual-consequences-of-female-genital-mutilation-cutting-fgm-c-a-systematic-review-of-quantitative-studies
15. Andersson S, Rymer J, Joyce D, Momoh C, Gayle C (2012). Sexual quality of life in women who have undergone female genital mutilation: a case–control study. BJOG, 119:1606-11.
16. Bjälkander O, Grant DS, Berggren V, et al (2013). Female genital mutilation in Sierra Le-one: forms, reliability of reported status, and accuracy of related demographic and health survey questions. Obstet Gynecol Int, 2013: 680926.
17. Alsibiani SA, Rouzi AA (2010). Sexual function in women with female genital mutilation. Fertil Steril, 93:722-4.
18. Fried S, Mahmoud Warsame A, Berggren V, et al (2013). Outpatients’ perspectives on problems and needs related to female genital mutilation/cutting: a qualitative study from Somaliland. Obstet Gynecol Int, 2013: 165893.
19. Cook RJ,  Dickens  BM,  Fathalla  MF  (2002). Female genital cutting (mutilation/circumcision): ethical and legal dimensions. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 79:281-7.
20. Abdulcadir J, Rodriguez MI, Petignat P, Say L (2015). Clitoral reconstruction after female genital mutilation/cutting: Case studies. J Sex Med, 12:274-81.
21. Berg RC, Underland V, Odgaard-Jensen J, et al (2014). Effects of female genital cutting on physical health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open, 4:e006316.
22. Moukhyer M  (2006).  Female  genital  mutilation (FGM): against women’s health and human rights.The Network: TUFH Women and Health Taskforce Second edition, September 2006.
23. UK-wide Guidance (2011) Female genital mutilation: caring for patients and child protection. http://www.fgmnationalgroup.org/documen ts/literature_bma.pdf
24. Rosen CB, J Heiman, S Leiblum, et al (2000). The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther, 26:191-208.
25. Harper A (1998). Development of the World Health Organisation WHOQOL-BREF quality of life assessment. Psychol Med, 28:551-8.
26. Malakouti SK, Fatollahi P, Mirabzadeh A, Zandi T (2007). Reliability, validity and factor structure of the GHQ-28 used among elderly Iranians. Int Psychogeriatr, 19:623-34.
27. Goldberg DP, Hillier VF (1979). A scaled version of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med, 9:139-45.
28. Werneke U, Goldberg DP, Yalcin I, Üstün B (2000). The stability of the factor structure of the General Health Questionnaire. Psychol Med, 30:823-9.
29. Yasin BA, Al-Tawil NG, Shabila NP, Al-Hadithi TS (2013). Female genital mutilation among Iraqi Kurdish women: a cross-sectional study from Erbil city. BMC Public Health, 13:809.
30. Jones SD, Ehiri J, Anyanwu E (2004). Female genital mutilation in developing countries: an agenda for public health response. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 116:144-51.
31. Yirga WS, Kassa NA, Gebremichael MW, Aro AR (2012).   Female   genital   mutilation: prevalence,   perceptions   and   effect   on women’s health in Kersa district of Ethiopia. Int J Womens Health, 4:45-54.
32. El-Zanaty F WA (2009). Egypt demographic  and
33. Mahmoud MIH (2016). Effect of female genital mutilation on female sexual function, Alexandria, Egypt. Alexandria J Med, 52: 55-59.
34. Berg RC, Denison E (2012). Does female genital mutilation/cutting (FGM/C) affect women’s sexual functioning? A systematic review of the sexual consequences of FGM/C. Sex Res Social Policy, 9:41-56.
35. Vloeberghs E, van der Kwaak A, Knipscheer J, van den Muijsenbergh M (2012). Coping and chronic psychosocial consequences of female genital mutilation in the Netherlands. Ethn Health, 17:677-95.
36. Behrendt A, Moritz S (2005). Posttraumatic stress disorder and memory problems after female genital mutilation. Am J Psychiatry, 162:1000-2.
37. KoolaeeAK, Pourebrahim T, Moh-ammadmoradi B, Hameedy MA (2012). The comparison of marital satisfaction and mental health in genital mutilated females and non-genital mutilated females. Int J High Risk Behav Addict, 1:115-120.